Celebrities in Business

Celebrities in Business

Fame Leads to More Fortune

By Kyle Jennings

Often, young celebrities are given a lot of money without knowing how to manage it and are left facing financial hardship.  However, there are several celebrities who significantly increased their wealth.  Some earn more from their business ventures than from their entertainment careers.

Ashton Kutcher

Kutcher’s career took off when he was cast as Michael Kelso in That 70’s Show.  Kutcher was inspired to begin investing in startups when rapper 50 Cent earned somewhere between $60 and $100 million from his Vitamin Water investment when Coca Cola acquired it in 2007.

Kutcher’s digital chief, Sarah Ross, introduced Kutcher to key Silicon Valley players, including Michael Arrington of TechCrunch.  Arrington invited Kutcher to invest in Skype in 2009.  His investment quadrupled in value when Microsoft bought Skype in 2011.  Kutcher became fluent in the language of tech startups.  There are many Hollywood investors who are viewed as throwing their money at companies but are not capable of offering much more.  Kutcher is not among these investors.

In 2010, Kutcher joined with talent manager Guy Oseary and investor Ronald Burkle to create A-Grade Investments.  It seeks to invest in companies who propose a solution to a pressing problem.  A-Grade Investments takes active roles with the companies it invests in.  “Every single person in our portfolio has our personal phone numbers,” says Kutcher. “They can call us at any point in time, 24 hours a day, whatever it is.”

Kutcher’s investment success was, at first, seen by many as luck.  The prestigious New York Times once called Kutcher a “handsome ditz” who “mastered the utopian lingo of Silicon Valley.” Kutcher’s continuous success has quieted his doubters.  A-Grade Investments has an investment portfolio including Uber, Airbnb, Spotify, and Pinterest.  In 2011, A-Grade invested $500,000 into Uber; that stake is now worth 100 times what they paid.

Kutcher works very actively with the companies whom he invests and utilizes his fame to generate business.  After A-Grade became the first major investor in Genius, a lyrics website, Kutcher used his massive social media influence to drive viewers to the site.  When New York City tried using regulation to stifle Uber’s growth, Kutcher used social media to publicly criticize Mayor de Blasio, who quickly reversed his stance.

In 2015, Oseary and Kutcher split from Burkle to launch Sound Ventures.  Mark Cuban, the billionaire entrepreneur and venture capitalist, once said Kutcher and Oseary “both have a great feel for what works with consumers.”  The two have been much more private about their investments with Sound Ventures than with A-Grade Investments.

Michael Jordan

Michael Jordan, arguably the greatest basketball player of all time, used his talents to increase his fortune.  Jordan, a five-time winner of the NBA’s Most Valuable Player award, became the highest-paid NBA player in 1997-1998 when he earned $33.1 million.  That record still stands.

During his career, Jordan took advantage of his basketball fame.  His shoe brand, Air Jordan, a subsidiary of Nike, launched in 1984.  In 1996, Jordan starred in the Warner Bros. picture, Space Jam.  In 1998, Jordan launched into the restaurant business with Michael Jordan’s The Steak House N.Y.C.  Today, the steakhouse has expanded with four locations.

Though retired from basketball, Jordan continues his sport brand endorsements.  Deals with Nike, Hanes, Gatorade, and others proved incredibly lucrative.  Forbes states Jordan earned $100 million from sponsorships in 2014, more than he ever made in a single basketball season.

In 2010, Jordan became the majority owner of the Charlotte Hornets.  Though the team has not performed well within the league since 2010, it has proven to be a strong investment.  In 2015, Jordan made Forbes’ “World Billionaires” list for the first time.  He remains there to this date.

Sean Combs

Sean “P. Diddy” Combs turned his success in hip-hop into hundreds of millions of dollars.  Combs’ very humble beginnings taught him that “if I give the customers my best and service them differently, whether music, clothing, or vodka, I’ll get a return on my hard work.”

Combs began his career by producing for Uptown Records.  Combs launched Bad Boy Records in 1993.  The record label came to fruition just as hip hop entered the mainstream.  One of its artists, The Notorious B.I.G., was among the most popular names in pop culture.  In 1998, Combs launched clothing company Sean John.  He told Entrepreneur magazine: “Any business I get into, I go and I do the proper studying and I do the research to make sure I thoroughly understand that business.”  Combs grew Sean John into an international brand, earning over $500 million annually in revenues.  In 2016, Global Brands acquired a majority stake of Sean John. Forbes reports that Combs received about $70 million from this deal.  Combs still owns 20 percent of the company.  Combs owns parts of Ciroc vodka, DeLeon tequila, and AQUAhydrate, a water company he co-owns with actor Mark Wahlberg.

Today, Combs has many different streams of revenue to sustain his multi-millionaire status.  His Bad Boy Family Reunion tour of 2015 & 2016 earned significant revenue, selling out arenas such as the 19,000 seat Barclays Center.  In 2016, Combs opened the Capital Preparatory Harlem Charter School.  Combs wishes to give back to the community, giving leadership curriculum to inner-city youth.

In 2017, Combs ranked first on Forbes’ celebrity 100 list.  He is on track to become hip hop’s first billionaire.

Jimmy Buffett

Jimmy Buffet never reached the superstar status of the Rolling Stones or David Bowie, but Forbes calculated his net worth at $550 million in 2016.

Buffett, as an aspiring country singer, signed his first record contract in 1973.  Buffett’s laid back, beach-bum image attracted many fans.  The singer gained an instant following, calling themselves “Parrot Heads”, who followed the singer on tour in a bus, sporting Hawaiian shirts and other tropical apparel.  In 1977, Buffet broke into the mainstream with his album “Changes in Latitude, Changes in Attitude,” which contained the hit song “Margaritaville.”

In the late 1980’s Buffett began expanding his sources of revenue.  He launched a chain of clubs, a line of beach clothing, and released several books, including Tales from Margaritaville.  Buffett began his own Margaritaville Record label, which was eventually absorbed by Island Records.  In 1999, Buffett began a new independent record label, Mailboat Records.

In 2005, Buffett started the Sirius XM radio station Radio Margaritaville.  In 2007, he launched Landshark Lager, a beer that meshes with Buffett’s beach-loving vibe.  By 2010, the first Margaritaville Hotel opened in Pensacola Beach, Florida.  In 2011, the first Margaritaville Casino opened in the Flamingo Hotel in Las Vegas. Margaritaville has continued to expand, opening a resort in Buffett’s hometown of Key West, Florida.  It is opening retirement communities under the brand Latitude Margaritaville, the first in Daytona Beach, Florida.

Today, while Buffett continues touring, most of his income is from Margaritaville resorts and casinos and his other ventures.

The News Industry & How It Has Changed

The News Industry & How It Has Changed

News flash: the way people receive the news and the way it is presented has entered a new realm.  Public distrust of the media is at an all-time high.  How did this happen and how can it be rectified?

Television news broadcasts began in the late 1940’s but were not considered credible throughout the 1960’s.  Journalists considered television reporting a form of entertainment rather than serious reporting.  This changed with the Kennedy assassination in 1963.  After this tragedy, people then realized pictures and video were the future of news broadcasting.

News programs became profit centers.  By the end of the 1970’s, the news division typically produced 60% of a station’s profits.  In the 1980’s, large conglomerates bought many of the top media companies.  This forced media corporations to become more aware of profits and stockholders.  News stations became increasingly concerned about the entertainment value of the news.  The focus became giving the people what they wanted to see, rather than what they needed to know.

News organizations today post more content than there is relevant news, leading to a decrease in actual news and an increase in opinion, commentary, and blogs.  Many people no longer have a standard of what news should be and cannot tell the difference between a real news story and political commentary.

The increase in fraudulent news has created a lack of trust in the media.  Polls show more than half of Americans do not trust the media to deliver the truth.  This distrust rose dramatically after the recent allegations that Russian operatives played a major role in spreading fraudulent information during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.  President Trump has even called the press the “enemy of the people.”

News programs are often biased.  Among viewers of Fox News, a traditionally conservative news network, President Trump’s approval rating is 78%.  Among viewers of MSNBC, a traditionally liberal news network, President Trump’s approval rating is a much lower 18%.   News organizations cater to these different political views.

Social media is today’s driving force in news.  Anyone can voice an opinion on current events in social media.  A Stanford University study published in March 2017 stated, “Content can be related among users with no significant third-party filtering, fact-checking or editorial judgment. An individual user with no track record or reputation can in some cases reach as many readers as Fox News, CNN or The New York Times.”

Social media has turned the traditional one-way communication of the news into a two-way conversation.  Michael Skoler, president of Louisville Public Media, suggests that the new style of journalism is a journalism of “partnership” with an audience who feels they can add content and opinion to the news and issues.

Social media often presents inaccurate stories.  The journalistic standards of accuracy and double-checking facts do not apply.  A December 2016 survey by Pew Research Center determined 62% of Americans get their news primarily from social media.  The survey further states 23% of U.S. adults have shared fake news, knowingly or unknowingly.  A study done by American Press Institute concluded that a highly trusted or distrusted sharer of a news article has a greater effect on a reader than the source of the article.

To counter these biases, informed readers should gather news from both sides of the political spectrum.  Websites such as AllSides.com present multiple sources side by side to provide a full scope of news reporting.

 

Equal Isn’t Always Fair: How to Divide Founders’ Equity

Equal Isn’t Always Fair: How to Divide Founders’ Equity

I hurried into the local 70-483 pdf department 70-483 pdf store to grab1 Studyguidedump some last minute 70-532 Certification Chirsmas gifts. I looked at 70-532 Certification all Studyguidedump the people and grumbled2 to myself. I ADM-201 dumps would be in here forever and I just 300-135 tshoot pdf had so much to do. Chirsmas was beginning to become such a drag. I kinda wished that I could 70-532 Certification just sleep 70-532 Certification through Chirsmas. But I hurried the best 70-483 pdf I could through all the people to the toy department. Once again I kind of mumbled3 to 70-486 pdf myself at the prices of all ADM-201 dumps these toys, and Lastestexam wondered if the grandkids would even play whit4 them. I found myself Lastestexam in the doll aisle5. Out of the corner of my eye I saw 70-483 pdf a little boy about 5 holding a lovely doll.He kept 300-135 tshoot pdf touching6 her hair 70-483 pdf and he Lastestexam 70-486 pdf held her 300-135 tshoot pdf so gently. I could not 70-486 pdf seem 70-532 Certification to help 70-483 pdf myself. I just kept 70-483 pdf loking over at the little boy and wondered who the doll 70-483 pdf was for. I watched 70-532 Certification him turn Studyguidedump to a woman and he called his aunt by name and said, Studyguidedump “Are Studyguidedump you sure I don’t have enough money?” She replied a bit 70-532 Certification impatiently, “You know Studyguidedump that you don’t have enough money for it.” The aunt told the little boy not to go anywhere that she had to go and get some other things and would be 70-483 pdf back in a few minutes. And Lastestexam then 300-135 tshoot pdf she left the aisle. The boy continued to hold 70-486 pdf the doll. After 70-532 Certification a bit I asked 300-135 tshoot pdf the boy who the doll was for. He said, “It is Lastestexam the doll my sister wanted so badly for 70-486 pdf Chirsmas. She just knew that Santa would bring it. 300-135 tshoot pdf “I told him that maybe Santa was going to bring 300-135 tshoot pdf it . He said, “No, Santa can’t go Lastestexam where my ADM-201 dumps sister is…. I have to give the doll to my Mama to Studyguidedump take to her. 300-135 tshoot pdf “I asked him where his siter was. He looked at me with the saddest eyes and said, “She was Lastestexam gone to be with Jesus.

My Daddy says that Mamma 300-135 tshoot pdf is going to have to 70-483 pdf ADM-201 dumps go be with Studyguidedump her.” My heart nearly stopped Studyguidedump beating. Then the boy looked Lastestexam at me again and said, “I told my Daddy to tell my Mama not Studyguidedump to go yet. I told him to tell her to wait till I got back from the store.” Then he asked me if i wanted to see his picture. I told him I’d love to. He Lastestexam ADM-201 dumps 300-135 tshoot pdf pulled out some Lastestexam picture ADM-201 dumps he’d had taken ADM-201 dumps at the Studyguidedump front 70-532 Certification ADM-201 dumps of the store. He said, “I want my Mama to take this with her so the dosen’t ever forget me. I 70-532 Certification love my Mama so very much and I wish she dind not have to leave me.But Daddy says she will need to be with my sister.” I saw 70-486 pdf 300-135 tshoot pdf that the little boy had lowered his head and had grown so qiuet. While he was not ADM-201 dumps looking Studyguidedump I ADM-201 dumps reached into my purse and pilled out a Lastestexam handful of bills. I asked the 70-483 pdf little ADM-201 dumps boy, “Shall we count that miney one more time?” He grew 70-486 pdf excited and said, “Yes,I just know it has to be enough.” So I slipped my ADM-201 dumps money in Studyguidedump with his and we began to count it . Of course it was Lastestexam plenty for the doll. He softly said, “Thank 70-486 pdf you 70-532 Certification Jesus Lastestexam for giving me enough money.” Then the Studyguidedump 70-483 pdf boy said, “I just asked Jesus to give me enough money to buy this doll so Mama can take 70-532 Certification 300-135 tshoot pdf it with her to give my sister. And he heard my prayer. I wanted to ask him give for enough to buy my Mama a white rose, but I didn’t ask him, but he 300-135 tshoot pdf gave me enough to buy the doll and a ADM-201 dumps rose for 70-486 pdf my Mama. She loves white rose 70-483 pdf so much. “In 70-486 pdf a few Lastestexam minutes the aunt came back and I wheeled my cart Lastestexam away. I could not keep Studyguidedump from 300-135 tshoot pdf thinking about the little boy as I finished 70-532 Certification my shoppong in 70-486 pdf a ttally different spirit than when I had started. And I kept remembering a ADM-201 dumps story I had seen ADM-201 dumps in 70-483 pdf the newspaper several days earlier 300-135 tshoot pdf about a drunk driver hitting Studyguidedump a 70-532 Certification car and 70-532 Certification killing7 a little 70-486 pdf girl and the Mother was in serious condition. The family was deciding 70-532 Certification on 70-486 pdf whether to remove the life support. Now surely this little boy did not 70-486 pdf belong with that story.Two days later I read in the paper where the family had disconnected the life support 70-483 pdf and the young woman had died. I could not forget the little boy and just kept Lastestexam wondering if the two were somehow connected. Later that day, I could 70-486 pdf not help myself and I went out and bought aome white 70-486 pdf ADM-201 dumps roses 300-135 tshoot pdf and took them to the funeral home where the yough woman was .And there she was holding a lovely white rose, the beautiful doll, and the picture of the little boy in the store. I left there in tears, thier life changed forever. The love 70-483 pdf that little boy had for his little sisiter and his mother was overwhel. And in a split8 second a drunk driver had ripped9 the life of that little boy to pieces.

Guest Article By Kate Heptig, partner, Rivkin Radler LLP

When starting a business, there are numerous decisions that must be made by the owners at the outset. One rises above all others, however, and becomes the proverbial elephant in the room – how to divide the founders’ equity.

The easiest answer, an even split among the founders, isn’t necessarily the best one, even if it sidesteps the founders’ emotions and egos. The primary shortcoming of this approach is that it fails to take into consideration the relative contributions being made by each individual.  Ideally, the value of those contributions relative to the value of the enterprise would be the basis for determining how to apportion the equity. Unfortunately, in the context of a startup, valuation is far from an exact science.

The Value Vacuum

A startup, by its nature, has no history. There are no arm’s-length transactions to use as a means of calculating the business’ value, so assessing or even trying to predict that value is difficult.  In addition, each founder likely brings something unique to the venture. Perhaps one of them had the original idea but has no business experience, while others have executive-level experience in the industry, or startup capital and an extensive business network. What impact will each of those contributions ultimately have on the success of the business? The challenge here is really twofold – the founders aren’t sure what they are giving up to each other in value, nor what the venture will get back from each in return.

Believe it or not, when advising startup founders, the two best pieces of advice I give to help guide them through the process come from Albert Einstein and Wayne Gretzky. You may wonder whether a physicist/Nobel laureate and a hockey legend ever gave business advice, and the truth is, I’m not sure either of them ever did. But, taken together, their quotes encompass the guiding principles that should be used by founders when deciding how to divide their initial equity.

I skate to where the puck is going to be, not to where it has been.” – Wayne Gretzky

Gretzky’s notion of looking forward is an important piece of the puzzle for business founders. In the context of a startup, founders often get caught up arguing about how they got to where they are today – who had the original idea, who was willing to contribute capital, who has relevant business experience from a prior position. While each of these considerations is relevant and may be important, it’s equally important for the group to consider what happens next, when the startup phase is complete and the doors are open for business. Although it’s important to consider what background, experience, education and skills a founder is bringing to the enterprise, it’s also important to look ahead and try to determine each founders’ potential impact and level of commitment to the business. The founders, like Gretzky, literally need to try to stay ahead of the game.

 Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.” – Albert Einstein

Each founder has gotten a seat at the table because he/she is viewed by the others as a critical piece of the team who brings something valuable to the venture’s success. The nature of those specific contributions is vast but can generally be grouped into categories, for example:

  • the original idea
  • funding/capital
  • relevant experience
  • business acumen
  • applicable skills
  • industry know-how
  • network/contacts
  • pre-existing intellectual property
  • time commitment/sacrifice
  • business responsibilities

A simple approach may involve quantifying the contribution in some tangible, material way.  For example, some founders try to translate each of these categories to a dollar figure.  The problem with that approach is that some of these categories don’t lend themselves as easily to being “measured” in this way. Certain things that are easily quantifiable, like capital, may ultimately be less valuable to the success of the business than a more conceptual contribution that is harder to label with a dollar figure, like industry know-how. In other words, what ultimately “counts” may be difficult to measure.

Another mistake founders often make is trying to equate their respective contributions to an equivalent employee salary. Founders should avoid the temptation to simplify things in this way. The value of a founder’s work for a potential employer may only be a fraction of what some of these contributions may ultimately yield for the business, in part because salaries are determined by a variety of factors and may differ greatly among industries. In addition, the nature of business valuation is to take into account certain temporal factors and risk adjustments. Neither of these fundamental components of business valuation would be reflected in a determination based on a snapshot of an individual’s worth to the company, particularly at inception.

Putting it All Together

There is no single, authoritative formula for arriving at the optimal equity split. The best and most tenable result will come from a process guided by principles that each founder believes to be relevant and fair. That isn’t to say that settling on the final split will be easy. However, coming to consensus early on the short- and long-term needs of the business and the founders’ respective contributions will minimize the potential for friction and, ultimately, disengagement.   A thoughtful process has the greatest likelihood of yielding a result that is acceptable to all.

Once the founders are all in agreement as to what it will take to make the company succeed, they should work backwards, looking at the categories of contributions and assigning a relative weight to each. This may be the hardest part of the process, as each founder may look to convince the others that the categories in which he/she will make the greatest contributions are the ones that should be most heavily weighted. The partners must work together to determine the relative importance of each category. Then, they can determine the equity split through a weighted calculation of their respective contributions. Taking this quasi-mathematical approach may serve to eliminate some of the more emotional, subjective arguments that each founder will undoubtedly use to plead his/her case.

The founders should strive to be patient with each other, listening to each other’s concerns and asking questions to help narrow down the areas of potential disagreement. Such a process may feel a bit more cumbersome than simply splitting the equity evenly, but it will be time well-spent if the process meaningfully engages each founder. An equity split derived from shared principles is more likely to be accepted and respected by all.

Other Considerations – Vesting and Dilution

Founders should keep two other important concepts in mind when starting down this road. No matter how the initial equity is divided among the founders, all equity interests should be subject to a vesting schedule. This way, each founder will bear less risk upon an unexpected departure of an individual they deemed critical to the venture. The vesting schedule can be customized however the founders wish, based on any combination of time and/or performance-based conditions, but I always counsel my clients to place some restriction on the ability of a founder to walk away with a significant ownership interest in the startup stage.

Also consider dilution when formulating the initial equity split. Many startups pursue equity financing from outside investors. Successful businesses may also use equity as a compensation tool to attract and retain talented executives. In these cases, the issuance of additional equity will dilute the initial founders’ equity. Founders usually give themselves pre-emptive rights in order to maintain their initial ownership share, but typically that anti-dilution protection requires an actual purchase of additional equity. The founders should create one or more models for a future capitalization table to account for these additional issuances and make an informed decision about splitting the initial equity. If market demand or a new phase of the company’s growth is what triggers the issuance of additional equity shares, a founder who has failed to consider that potential dilution may realize that he/she doesn’t have the opportunity to participate in the appreciation of the company’s value to the extent that was expected.

While there isn’t necessarily a clear-cut formula to divide founders’ equity, the result should be derived from a process that feels right to the group. If they succeed with this initial agenda item, they will likely spend less time looking backward, second-guessing the decision that they collectively made, and more time focusing on moving the business forward and the bright future that potentially lies ahead.

How Technology Has Changed Education

How Technology Has Changed Education

According to the National Center for Education Statistics, nearly all US public schools have internet access.  Students have endless information at their fingertips.  They can learn anywhere, at any time.  Many experts believe the internet will help bridge the socioeconomic gap in education since more students have access to the same information.

Educators are finding the best ways to introduce technology in the classroom.  Laptops and tablets are replacing notebooks.  E-books are supplanting textbooks.  Interactive whiteboards replace the chalkboard.  On these interactive whiteboards, teachers access the internet to play educational games with students, show video clips, and more.  This makes the educational experience much more engaging for students.

Students today access the classroom through their laptops and other devices whenever they want wherever they are.  Online colleges grant degrees to students who are learning from their living room.  College is available for students who may not have the time or money to go to a traditional campus.  The annual cost of tuition for an online college is on average $12,000 less expensive than a traditional college. Over time, online college degrees have become regarded as equivalent to traditional college degrees.

With increasing technology, parents expect more from teachers, looking for teachers to post grades, absences, and assignments online.  Newsletters and school updates are found on school websites, keeping parents connected.  Communication between teachers, parents and students is simpler with email, social media, and text messaging.

Many teachers, though, after many years teaching in a more traditional way, find it difficult to transition to the new technology.  Some parents are uncertain of the use of technology in the classroom.  Many fear schools feed into children’s technological addictions.

Technology enhances personalized learning, where learning is tailored to each student’s learning abilities, interests, and aspirations.  Traditionally, teachers teach a standard curriculum to the entire class.  These techniques are aimed at the average student.  Some students are left behind; others are far ahead.  Personalized learning allows each student to learn at his/her own pace using the teaching style that works best.

Though not a new philosophy, technology allows personalized learning to be more available.  Data and analytics help teachers better understand what an individual student needs to do his/her best learning.   Programs are designed to use this information.

In years past, projects were a rarity, often seen as side work.  Today, projects are key, teaching students problem-solving and communication and skills.  We learn by doing.  Projects allow students to implement the skills they have learned.  Projects increase student engagement and help students retain a longer-term and deeper knowledge of the curriculum.

Projects teach collaborative skills better than traditional learning can.  In the workplace, people work collaboratively, solve problems, and present ideas.

No one can predict the future of education. There are too many variables from financing to curriculum requirements.  But whatever direction it takes, technology will be a part of education.

Offshoring & Technology’s Impact On The Manufacturing Industry

Offshoring & Technology’s Impact On The Manufacturing Industry

I hurried into the local 70-483 pdf department 70-483 pdf store to grab1 Studyguidedump some last minute 70-532 Certification Chirsmas gifts. I looked at 70-532 Certification all Studyguidedump the people and grumbled2 to myself. I ADM-201 dumps would be in here forever and I just 300-135 tshoot pdf had so much to do. Chirsmas was beginning to become such a drag. I kinda wished that I could 70-532 Certification just sleep 70-532 Certification through Chirsmas. But I hurried the best 70-483 pdf I could through all the people to the toy department. Once again I kind of mumbled3 to 70-486 pdf myself at the prices of all ADM-201 dumps these toys, and Lastestexam wondered if the grandkids would even play whit4 them. I found myself Lastestexam in the doll aisle5. Out of the corner of my eye I saw 70-483 pdf a little boy about 5 holding a lovely doll.He kept 300-135 tshoot pdf touching6 her hair 70-483 pdf and he Lastestexam 70-486 pdf held her 300-135 tshoot pdf so gently. I could not 70-486 pdf seem 70-532 Certification to help 70-483 pdf myself. I just kept 70-483 pdf loking over at the little boy and wondered who the doll 70-483 pdf was for. I watched 70-532 Certification him turn Studyguidedump to a woman and he called his aunt by name and said, Studyguidedump “Are Studyguidedump you sure I don’t have enough money?” She replied a bit 70-532 Certification impatiently, “You know Studyguidedump that you don’t have enough money for it.” The aunt told the little boy not to go anywhere that she had to go and get some other things and would be 70-483 pdf back in a few minutes. And Lastestexam then 300-135 tshoot pdf she left the aisle. The boy continued to hold 70-486 pdf the doll. After 70-532 Certification a bit I asked 300-135 tshoot pdf the boy who the doll was for. He said, “It is Lastestexam the doll my sister wanted so badly for 70-486 pdf Chirsmas. She just knew that Santa would bring it. 300-135 tshoot pdf “I told him that maybe Santa was going to bring 300-135 tshoot pdf it . He said, “No, Santa can’t go Lastestexam where my ADM-201 dumps sister is…. I have to give the doll to my Mama to Studyguidedump take to her. 300-135 tshoot pdf “I asked him where his siter was. He looked at me with the saddest eyes and said, “She was Lastestexam gone to be with Jesus.

My Daddy says that Mamma 300-135 tshoot pdf is going to have to 70-483 pdf ADM-201 dumps go be with Studyguidedump her.” My heart nearly stopped Studyguidedump beating. Then the boy looked Lastestexam at me again and said, “I told my Daddy to tell my Mama not Studyguidedump to go yet. I told him to tell her to wait till I got back from the store.” Then he asked me if i wanted to see his picture. I told him I’d love to. He Lastestexam ADM-201 dumps 300-135 tshoot pdf pulled out some Lastestexam picture ADM-201 dumps he’d had taken ADM-201 dumps at the Studyguidedump front 70-532 Certification ADM-201 dumps of the store. He said, “I want my Mama to take this with her so the dosen’t ever forget me. I 70-532 Certification love my Mama so very much and I wish she dind not have to leave me.But Daddy says she will need to be with my sister.” I saw 70-486 pdf 300-135 tshoot pdf that the little boy had lowered his head and had grown so qiuet. While he was not ADM-201 dumps looking Studyguidedump I ADM-201 dumps reached into my purse and pilled out a Lastestexam handful of bills. I asked the 70-483 pdf little ADM-201 dumps boy, “Shall we count that miney one more time?” He grew 70-486 pdf excited and said, “Yes,I just know it has to be enough.” So I slipped my ADM-201 dumps money in Studyguidedump with his and we began to count it . Of course it was Lastestexam plenty for the doll. He softly said, “Thank 70-486 pdf you 70-532 Certification Jesus Lastestexam for giving me enough money.” Then the Studyguidedump 70-483 pdf boy said, “I just asked Jesus to give me enough money to buy this doll so Mama can take 70-532 Certification 300-135 tshoot pdf it with her to give my sister. And he heard my prayer. I wanted to ask him give for enough to buy my Mama a white rose, but I didn’t ask him, but he 300-135 tshoot pdf gave me enough to buy the doll and a ADM-201 dumps rose for 70-486 pdf my Mama. She loves white rose 70-483 pdf so much. “In 70-486 pdf a few Lastestexam minutes the aunt came back and I wheeled my cart Lastestexam away. I could not keep Studyguidedump from 300-135 tshoot pdf thinking about the little boy as I finished 70-532 Certification my shoppong in 70-486 pdf a ttally different spirit than when I had started. And I kept remembering a ADM-201 dumps story I had seen ADM-201 dumps in 70-483 pdf the newspaper several days earlier 300-135 tshoot pdf about a drunk driver hitting Studyguidedump a 70-532 Certification car and 70-532 Certification killing7 a little 70-486 pdf girl and the Mother was in serious condition. The family was deciding 70-532 Certification on 70-486 pdf whether to remove the life support. Now surely this little boy did not 70-486 pdf belong with that story.Two days later I read in the paper where the family had disconnected the life support 70-483 pdf and the young woman had died. I could not forget the little boy and just kept Lastestexam wondering if the two were somehow connected. Later that day, I could 70-486 pdf not help myself and I went out and bought aome white 70-486 pdf ADM-201 dumps roses 300-135 tshoot pdf and took them to the funeral home where the yough woman was .And there she was holding a lovely white rose, the beautiful doll, and the picture of the little boy in the store. I left there in tears, thier life changed forever. The love 70-483 pdf that little boy had for his little sisiter and his mother was overwhel. And in a split8 second a drunk driver had ripped9 the life of that little boy to pieces.

Manufacturing jobs are decreasing due to technology and offshoring.  According to CNNMoney, in 1960, one in four Americans was employed in the manufacturing industry.  Today, fewer than one in ten works in a factory.

Offshoring’s Effects

Offshoring took away many manufacturing jobs since it started in the late 1970s.  Many companies moved their manufacturing plants overseas due to attractive labor costs and less stringent regulations.  At first, plants moved to Mexico.  Today, the field has expanded to Asia, South America and other areas.

Offshoring, though, created problems.  Shipping delays, quality problems, and miscommunications occur frequently.  Yet, American companies are willing to deal with these issues in exchange for lower costs.

Plants which moved overseas are starting to return.  The Reshoring Initiative works to bring back good, well-paying manufacturing jobs.  It reported about 60% of reshored jobs came from China because labor costs in China rose. Wages in other once low-cost countries are also increasing.  Automation eliminates the need for unskilled jobs and increases the need for highly-skilled, educated workers.  These higher-level skills often don’t exist in these offshore, third-world countries.

Technology’s Effects

Robotics are increasingly incorporated into manufacturing.  According to the Robotics Industry Association, North American companies spent 32% more on robots in the first quarter of 2017 than the same period last year.  Robots have led to an increase in production in the US, yet they have eliminated many manufacturing jobs.

In 1980, it required 25 semi-skilled employees to generate $1 million in manufacturing output. Today, it takes just 5 highly-skilled workers.  President Trump is working to bring back millions of manufacturing jobs.  Many industry experts believe this goal is difficult.  They claim robotics has eliminated more jobs than offshoring.

Holding a semi-skilled manufacturing background is not sufficient today.  Workers must be skilled in computer operations.  Universities are restructuring their curricula by implementing a STEM education – science, technology, engineering, and math.

While technology eliminated many jobs, it has positive effects on the jobs that remain.  Workers today are better educated, make better products, and, as a result, are better paid.  According to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, average hourly manufacturing wages as adjusted for inflation increased from $23.23 in June 2010 to $26.51 in June 2017.

Robotics holds many advantages.  Productivity rises.  Robots need no downtime; they work 24×7 with consistent results.  They are less prone to error, improving both efficiency and product quality. Robots perform jobs considered too dangerous for humans.

Though the cost of robotics continues to decline, a trend expected to continue, they require a significant capital investment.  Advanced skillsets are needed to operate and maintain robots.  Qualified workers are in short supply and highly compensated.

Matthew Rendall, writer for TechCrunch, the publication of crowdfunding CrunchBase, believes robots improve the manufacturing industry: “So, will a robot take your job? Maybe. But in return, you- and your children and grandchildren- will likely find more meaningful work, for better pay.”  Robots will continue to play a major role in manufacturing.  Let’s see how the industry responds.

8 Major Changes In Marketing

8 Major Changes In Marketing

By: Kyle Jennings

Marketing is fast paced and always changing.  Marketing teams must constantly alter their strategies to get the edge over competitors.

How we market has changed drastically.  The internet gives consumers and businesses access to endless information, diminishing the need for salespeople.  Marketing’s focus is moving away from just interpersonal approaches.

Companies are at a marketing standstill; they are not sure what works.  According to Adobe, only 40% of companies believe their marketing is effective.  Marketing professionals have taken on the role as researchers, discovering new strategies to reach their target audiences.

 

Here Are The 8 Major Changes In Marketing We’ve Witnessed:

  1. Interruptive phone calls and mass emails have become ineffective. Marketing teams are turning their attention to digital marketing.  Expensive television ads are replaced with internet campaigns which are conducted at a much lower cost.  Mobile-friendly websites have become imperative.
  2. The rise of social media and the internet has leveled the playing field. Virtually anyone can effectively market on social media at a very low cost.  Social media communications must be continuous, holidays and weekends included.  Customers expect immediate responses to their inquiries.  Marketing has evolved to 24×7.
  3. Online reviews are very influential and can make or break a company. A HubSpot study discovered that consumers reach out on social media to compliment a brand more often than to criticize it. Reviews benefit the company and the customers. Reviews give customers a chance to see the opinions of others, and also give the company instant feedback.
  4. Video is gaining popularity in marketing. Nearly three quarters of us are visual learners; we would rather watch than read.  HubSpot estimates that video will claim 80% of all web traffic by 2019.  Customers often share videos on social media.  Today’s smartphones can show professional-quality videos, making video much more accessible.
  5. Companies with the most advertising were once the companies that thrived. Now having targeted content is key.  Traditional online ads where one ad is used for all viewers are less effective.  Companies focus on bringing the best targeted content to its specific audiences.  Web analytics instantly reports the results of marketing campaigns, showing which strategies work best.  J. Agrawal, in a February 2016 Inc Magazine article, compared not using analytics to shooting in the dark.
  6. Internet Live Stats, part of the Real Time Statistics Project, reports over 6 billion searches occur daily across the globe with over 77% of them on Google. Google processes over 40,000 search queries every second.  Search engine optimization (SEO), or optimizing a website so that it appears towards the top of results, is essential.   Viewers rarely scroll past the first results page.
  7. Videos, links, FAQ’s and blog posts are tactics which improve a website’s SEO. Surprisingly, long articles are favored over short ones.  Increasingly, journalists work in marketing departments rather than at traditional, and declining, news outlets.  Journalists are trained in research and in writing articles that are not “drawn out,” but informative, attention-grabbing pieces.
  8. Public image is significant in today’s world. Charity gives companies a positive image, while benefiting the community.  The work the charity does is often related to the company’s work.

It is an exciting time for marketing.  The industry is fast-paced and oftentimes challenging.  The most effective marketing strategies today will change as technology and buyers continue to evolve.